Skip to main content

Home Services

Cost Per Booked Job: The Only Number That Matters in Trades PPC

A roof replacement and a gutter clean come from the same campaign and are worth wildly different amounts. Until you bid on job value instead of lead volume, you are buying the cheap ones.

Share:

Here is the problem with high-ticket home services, stated plainly: the same campaign can produce a $600 repair and an $18,000 replacement, and if you are measuring cost per lead, those two look identical.

Worse, the cheap one looks *better* — it converts faster, from a shorter form, at a lower cost per lead. So bidding finds you more of it. Six months later you are drowning in small jobs, your crews are busy, and margin is flat.

The fix is to work out what a booked job is actually worth per service line, then buy against that.

TL;DR

  • Chain it: enquiry → qualified → quoted → booked → completed. Each step has a rate.
  • Calculate per service line, not blended. A blended average is the number that hides the problem.
  • Your ceiling is job margin × the share you'll spend acquiring it.
  • Feed booked-job value back so bidding stops treating a gutter clean like a roof.
  • Trades acquisition chain: enquiries qualify, get quoted, book, and complete — with per-service-line job values producing very different maximum bids

    Why blended averages lie

    Say you run roofing ads. Last month:

    Service lineJobsAvg job valueRevenue
    Repairs30$600$18,000
    Full replacement4$18,000$72,000
    Blended34$2,647$90,000

    The blended average says a job is worth $2,647. That number describes nothing that exists. No job is worth $2,647 — they are worth $600 or $18,000, and most of the revenue sits in four of the thirty-four.

    Bid on the blend and you overpay for repairs and badly underpay for replacements — losing every replacement auction to the competitor who did the maths per line.

    The four rates you need

    1. Enquiry → qualified. In the right service area, a job you actually want, not a supplier or a wrong number. In trades this is often brutal — half or worse for broad campaigns.

    2. Qualified → quoted. Did you get out there and price it? This is where speed-to-lead shows up. If nobody rang back for four hours, most of this leaks.

    3. Quoted → booked. Your close rate. Trades owners usually know this one well.

    4. Booked → completed. Cancellations, financing falls-through, jobs that slip out of the year. On high-ticket work this is a real number.

    Worked example: solar

    Per 100 enquiries on residential solar:

    StepRateResult
    Enquiries100
    Qualified55%55
    Quoted65%36
    Booked30%11
    Completed90%10

    Average completed job: $24,000. Gross margin after panels, inverter, labour, and permits: 28%.

  • Revenue from 100 enquiries: 10 × $24,000 = $240,000
  • Gross margin: $67,200
  • Margin per enquiry: $672
  • Spend a third of margin on acquisition and your maximum cost per enquiry is $224. Across 100 enquiries, that is a $22,400 acquisition allowance: about $2,036 per booked job for the 11 bookings, or $2,240 per completed job for the 10 completed installations.

    Many solar installers would call $224 per enquiry excessive. It is not automatically excessive; it is the ceiling this example's economics support. A company that caps every enquiry at $60 because that “feels like a lot” may price itself out of valuable opportunities, while a company that blindly pays $224 for every form can still lose money when qualification or completion rates deteriorate.

    Turning it into bids

    Once you have a ceiling per service line:

    1. Separate campaigns by service line, or at minimum by ad group with distinct conversion values. A replacement campaign and a repair campaign should not share a budget.

    2. Assign conversion values that reflect job value, not a flat $1 per lead.

    3. Feed booked jobs back from your CRM as offline conversions, keyed on the click ID — the method is in offline conversion tracking. This is what lets bidding learn that the "expensive" replacement lead was worth thirty repairs.

    4. Choose a business-specific buffer below the ceiling. Model a weak case using your normal volatility, conversion delay, cash flow, and completion risk; there is no universal safe percentage.

    Where trades owners get this wrong

    Using revenue instead of margin. An $18,000 roof at 18% margin produces $3,240, while a $7,500 bathroom at 45% produces $3,375. Their contribution is much closer than their revenue suggests.

    Ignoring crew capacity. If you can complete eight replacements a month, buying leads for twenty is not a win — it's a scheduling problem and a pile of annoyed prospects. Budget follows capacity; the reasoning is in budget pacing.

    Not counting calls. In trades most enquiries are phone calls. If calls aren't tracked, every number above is guesswork — see call tracking.

    Forgetting repeat and referral. A satisfied HVAC install customer is a service contract and two neighbour referrals. If you can measure it, it belongs in job value.

    Want your ceiling calculated?

    The maths is not hard. Getting the real rates out of a trades business — where half the enquiries are calls and the CRM is a whiteboard — is the actual work, and it's usually the highest-value week anyone spends on the account.

    Related reading:

  • Emergency vs Planned Demand in Trades Campaigns
  • Speed to Lead: Why Home Services Leads Don't Become Jobs
  • Call Tracking for PPC
  • How Much Should You Spend on Ads?
  • Apply it to your account

    Need help applying it?

    Share your website, goal and current setup. We can discuss whether the project is a fit and agree on the scope before work starts.

    Get a project review

    PPC strategy & paid growth

    Back to all articles ↗

    Vince Servidad

    PPC & Creative Strategist | Google Ads & Meta Ads

    Remote work for ecommerce and lead-generation businesses in the US, UK, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the Philippines, and other international markets.

    © 2026 Vince ServidadPrivacy & termsHistorical results are not guarantees. Outcomes vary by business, market, and execution.